Category Archives: Hertie School of Governance

Structural unemployment and working poverty are not inevitable

Posted on
1

The plight of structural unemployment and gaggles of working poor, it appears, are here to stay. But are they the inevitable consequence of economic liberalisation?

They are not. If we balance the burden of economic transformation on labor and capital, and strengthen progression, we can have it both: near full employment and open borders.

 

Mindestlohn, DGB, 2009

The sentiment is right, but the policy is flawed.

 

No, the answer is not a minimum wage. No, it’s not protectionism. No, it won’t hurt growth. But yes, it will require fundamental reform, hard work and international cooperation.

Continue reading →

Foundations: benevolent, but undemocratic

Posted on
1

Foundations are booming in Germany and they are frequently cherished as the ideal way to harness private wealth for the common good.

I’m critical about the efficiency, equity and legitimacy of civil society, and I think foundations are a case in point. This tax-exempt, free-roaming and supposedly benevolent capital is subjected to only minimal public accountability and may sometimes reflect a troublingly elitist vision of the common good.

Bertelsmann Stiftung / AG Berlin, via Flickr, originally uploaded by Gertrud K.

Kommandantenhaus, Unter den Linden 1, 10117 Berlin: charity?

Continue reading →

Civil society: feeling good is not enough

Posted on
3

Civil society is everybody’s darling in politics and policy today. It’s hard to find a policy student who hasn’t interned at some NGO, founded her own grassroots initiative and isn’t excited about non-profits in any given policy field.

Animal vs. disability charities, via Flickr, originally uploaded my Mot

So is the third sector panacea? Uh, maybe not. A third sector? Non-governmental, non-profit? What kind of definitions are these, anyway? And what would be an uncivil society?

Whenever social sciences come up with such terms that convey little more but a vague sense of something being different, or gone (think postmodern) there is always the danger that really, we don’t know (exactly) what we’re talking about.

For all their shortcomings, we roughly know how markets and states function, and how they fail. By contrast, we appear to know relatively little about how whatever it is we call “civil society” works.

Is it then reasonable to assume that civil society is categorically devoid of dysfunctions? Hardly so, I think.

As long as we don’t know what we’re cobbling together in civil society, we’d better stick to our lasts: the market and the state.

Continue reading →

In AfPak, Iraq and elsewhere: If you break it, you buy it

Posted on
2
Since the two GBU-38 500lb bombs struck the fuel tankers in Kunduz province, Afghanistan and engulfed by-standing civilians in a giant fireball on September 4, 2009, what have we really learned?

I fear that amid all the self-righteous blameshifting and  frantic second-guessing of the attack, which was launched from an American fighter jet, but ordered by the German Oberst Klein, we haven’t learned nearly enough.

We haven’t learned nearly enough about this mayhem of a failed state and the chaos that even the well-intentioned regime changes or peacemaking bring.

We haven’t learned nearly enough about the nightmares, that result all too often, when the high and mighty West comes to the rescue.

Tank Graffiti, via Flickr, originally uploaded by Luodanli

Tank Graffiti, via Flickr, originally uploaded by Luodanli

ISAF, MNF-I Go Home? – not so fast.

This isn’t a simple question of surging or withdrawing: from this nightmare, there is no waking up.

We need to learn a lesson, of what happens when we disrupt and exploit divided, traditional societies, equip them with technology and weaponry far outmatching their level of development. From this responsibility, there is no escaping.

It’s a simple lesson, we all accept before entering a store: if you break it, you buy it.

Continue reading →

Failure in Iraq: It’s Hobbes First, Then Jefferson/Madison

Posted on
3

On May 1st, 2003 when then President George W. Bush, declared the end of major combat operations and the mission Iraqi Freedom to be “accomplished” aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln aircraft carrier, much of the failure and dying in Iraq still lay ahead.

Mission Accomplished Banner on USS Abraham Lincoln

Mission Accomplished Banner on the USS Abraham Lincoln

The invasion, starting on March 19, 2003, had been a remarkable military success, on schedule and with comparatively few casualties (139 US troops and approximately 7,500 civilians before May 1, 2003 according to CNN and Iraq Body Count estimates, respectively).

In the insurgency that followed (and has recently slightly abated), more than 4,000 US troops and 60,000 Iraqi civilians were killed (ibid.). To this date, seven years after “major hostilities” ended, the country is still plagued by sectarian violence and crime, marred by economic hardship and destruction and paralyzed by deeply divided politics and dysfunctional government. The vision and partial casus belli of the “Coalition of the Willing”, to turn Iraq into a role model liberal democracy for the Middle East, has not materialized. Instead, the suffering and dying continues.

What happened?

Continue reading →