Multilateral Trade Dispute Settlement Helps “Right over Might”, Equity

english

“You skate to where the puck will be, not where it is.”

(Steve Jobs, CEO of Apple Inc.)

Trade liberalization, like much in international governance, happens both through regional and multilateral integration. In political economy, there has been some debate over the merits and demerits of regional trade blocs, whether they constitute “building blocs” or “stumbling stones” for world trade.

I think that by creating universally, rather than regionally binding precedents under the World Trade Organization‘s (WTO) Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU), multilateral integration helps us to level to playing field of trade liberalization, to strengthen “right over might” and to address the fundamental equity concerns of economic globalization.

Continue reading

Democratize the globe, or globalize democracy?

englishgerman

United Nations Building, New York, Summer 2008

United Nations Building, New York, Summer 2008

Most will agree that the global political institutions are curiously underdeveloped in the face of ever increasing economic, cultural and environmental interdependencies as well as new global security concerns. There is however little agreement as to how we should respond to this challenge.

The term paper for this semester’s mandatory “Democratic Governance” provided me with ample possibility to reflect upon this debate. In conclude that rather than relying on (truly particularistic) NGOs or devising institutions for one global democracy, for now, we should settle for global democratic institutions and seek to strengthen the respective influence of national legislatives.

While I am not a big fan of much of the research in International Relations otherwise, I thoroughly enjoyed working on this paper, mostly by trying to integrate perspectives and authors from other fields (sociology).

Please find below the complete essay available for download.